theinvestmentcapm.com
  • Home
  • Research
  • Teaching
  • Impact
  • Lu's Blog

Finance Colada

Is Asset Pricing Scientific?

4/3/2021

2 Comments

 
We have just released the latest q-factors data library that has been updated through December 2020. The table below shows that the Hou-Xue-Zhang (2015) q-factor model continues to fully subsume the Fama-French (2018) 6-factor model in the extended sample from January 1967 to December 2020.
Picture

The 6-factor model cannot explain the q-factors. The investment premium is 0.33% per month (t = 4.1), with a 6-factor alpha of 0.09% (t = 2.55). The return on equity (Roe) premium is 0.51% (t = 4.96), with a 6-factor alpha of 0.25% (t = 4.09). The Gibbons-Ross-Shanken (1989, GRS) test strongly rejects the 6-factor model with the null hypothesis that the 6-factor alphas of the investment and Roe premiums are jointly zero (p = 0.00).

More important, the Hou-Xue-Zhang q-factor model fully subsumes the Fama-French factors. The HML, CMA, and RMW premiums are on average 0.24%, 0.27%, and 0.27% per month (t = 1.76, 3.05, and 2.77), but their q-factor alphas are virtually zero, -0.01%, 0.01%, and 0.02% (t = -0.09, 0.39, and 0.3), respectively. UMD is on average 0.62% (t = 3.63), but its q-factor alpha is only 0.18% (t = 0.86). The GRS test fails to reject the q-factor model with the null that the q-factor alphas of HML, CMA, RMW, and UMD are jointly zero (p = 0.7).

So, is asset pricing scientific? Popper's (1959) demarcation between science and non-science hinges on
falsifiability. Lakatos (1970) says that a scientific research program should be "progressive" in that it needs to explain empirical puzzles with few ad hoc fixes. Despite his early "mob psychology" regarding theory choice in Structure (1962), Kuhn (1977) later characterizes a good theory in terms of its accuracy, consistency, scope, simplicity, and fruitfulness. Finally, Feyerabend (1975) argues that science is an anarchic enterprise with no particular epistemic order.

While conscientious about external forces at work, I am determined to show Feyerabend is wrong about asset pricing.


References

Feyerabend, Paul, 1975, Against Method, New Left Books.

Kuhn, Thomas S., 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press.

Kuhn, Thomas S., 1977, Objectivity, value judgment, and theory choice, in T. S. Kuhn, The Essential Tension, University of Chicago Press.

Lakatos, Imre, 1970, Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes, in Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.), Cambridge University Press. 

Popper, Karl, 1959, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Hutchinson & Co.


2 Comments
Ben French
4/10/2021 03:02:23 pm

Good job - do us favor and convince your fellow academics to abandon the Fama-French 6 factor model (for science)

Reply
Lu Zhang link
4/10/2021 03:42:24 pm

Thank you Ben. Cool last name!

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Lu Zhang

    An aspiring process metaphysician

    Archives

    April 2025
    February 2025
    December 2024
    April 2024
    February 2024
    December 2023
    July 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    August 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    November 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    October 2020
    May 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

  • Home
  • Research
  • Teaching
  • Impact
  • Lu's Blog